Keeping Secular Education in Bulgaria Secular
The Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church has been adamant recently in its attempts to persuade the government that the introduction of religious education in the core curriculum of Bulgarian schools is necessary.
Children nowadays do not adhere to moral values, the Church has argued, claiming that compulsory religious education would be the cure to the increasing aggression among youngsters.
In June, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov from the centrist-right GERB party said he was in favor of the introduction of religious education in schools.
However, the Bulgarian Education Ministry recently rejected the idea, pointing out that there are over 115 religious beliefs officially registered in the country – and it would be practically impossible to introduce all of them into classrooms.
As Education Minister Sergey Ignatov noted, the Church may reach out to children through the already existing Sunday schools and optional courses in public schools.
So far, it seems that the Orthodox Church will not be able to push religious indoctrination in .Bulgaria's schools.
However, Borisov's cabinet has been in the habit of making numerous U-turn decisions on various issues since it took over in 2009. Therefore, I feel the debate should be kept alive.
Political propaganda in schools is wrong. What about religion?
Last year, the Bulgarian society was outraged – and rightfully so – as it turned out that schoolchildren from the small town of Peshtera have taken part in puzzle contest, with teams receiving one word as prize for each successful solution. The final phrase ended reading "We Are GERB, We Are Stronger with You."
While there is a strong consensus in society that political propaganda in schools is utterly unacceptable, it appears that religious indoctrination of children as young as seven is fine for many.
If the notion of a 7-year-old GERB supporter is grotesque and frightening, then why shouldn't we find it disturbing if 7-year old kids already have strong religious convictions?
Should we back further segregation?
The introduction of religion in the core curriculum of Bulgarian schools is likely to increase segregation among ethnic groups in the country at a very early age.
It is safe to assume that the Orthodox Church will try to reach out to all ethnic Bulgarian children (save for Pomaks), while the central Islamic institutions will reach out ethnic Turkish children (since Bulgaria's Muslims are predominantly Turkish).
As a result, ethnic Bulgarian children will be taught that their Turkish friends' religion is "wrong" – and vice versa.
Does the Church "deserve" to take care of children?
Some disturbing statements have been heard recently from the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the most recent one being hardline Bishop Nikolay's statement "surrogate motherhood is no different from prostitution."
The same Bishop once made the insulting claim that a Madonna concert in Sofia was the reason why 16 people drowned in tragic accident back in 2009.
In June, a priest from the Sliven eparchy notoriously stated that "it would be a good idea to throw stones" at participants in the annual Sofia Pride LGBT parade. Fortunately, nobody listened to his "advice," but one should also note that the Church did not consider it necessary to distance itself from the outrageous remark.
The fact that the majority of Bulgaria's Holy Synod members were (expectedly) exposed as former spies of the totalitarian State Security secret service certainly does not improve the Church's image.
It would not be exaggerated to say that the majority of Bulgarians do not trust the official Orthodox Church, including many of those who do believe in God. There is a reason for that: the Church is simply surrounded by too much controversy.
The "limousine scandal" in Varna is just another example.
Will religion enhance education in Bulgaria?
The Bulgarian education system is in a deep crisis now, with functional illiteracy rates reaching disturbing highs.
I do not believe that introducing religious education will induce much harm to the current situation, since I highly doubt that children will be taught that the Earth is flat or that there is no evolution.
However, if the core curriculum should really be expanded, I feel that there are at least several much more vital subjects one should begin with, perhaps including more classes in math, science, literature and philosophy instead.
“It's always useful to gain some education BEFORE opening your mouth and demonstrating your lack of it”
Good advice. Take it. In this particular case it will be even better if you stick to the topic and do not go into irrelevant references in regard to the meaning of the expression “opium for the masses” (opiate of the masses). Don’t know where and when you got your education about Marx and Dialectical Materialism, but nowadays one has only to look up Wikipedia to get some idea about anything. Here is an example:
From this article it is clear that Sade was referring to ignorance rather than to religion when coining the phrase. There could be other sources but I am not going farther than that to point out that your remark is misplaced.
The imaginary Friend ringing my bell is a bit of mystery to me. Have no idea who that friend could be. The fact that you capitalised the word “friend” though, leads me to believe that it might stand for God. But this will be impossible since you would never show so much respect for the faithful...
Like to make it clear that no imaginary, or virtual friend, would give meaning to my or anybody's, I know, life (the insane ones excluded).
Finally, lots of people use different crutches to get through life. And only few are as magnificently strong as you claim to be. Bully for you, Seedy. On my part, I would rather be nonjudgmental when the question of personal believes are concerned...
It's always useful to gain some education BEFORE opening your mouth and demonstrating your lack of it. The "opiate of the masses" reference was used long before Marx, and indeed after him, by intellectuals who were by no means Communists - one being an ecclesiastic.
If Imaginary Friends ring your bell then bully for you; the rest of us need no such illusory clap-trap to give meaning to our lives. We can stand on our own two feet without a mythical crutch to cloud our intelligence and befuddle our senses.....
Fully agree with Hairydave’s point.
And Seedy, maybe it is about time you realise that it is the 21 century and the commie mantra “religion is opium for the masses” is passé?
I agree with you on the point that propaganda and brainwashing have no place in our schools. Unfortunately for forty five years we were fed propaganda and indoctrination against everything but a “holy” ideology and, as we all know, it did not work :)
Just what part do Imaginary Friends and belief in medieval superstition and fairy-tales have to play in "education"? Propaganda and brain-washing have no place in our schools any more, for Pete's sake!
In case some of us haven't noticed, it's the 21st Century and we no longer need ghost stories to con us into believing that our Lords Temporal have to be obeyed and paid off or their buddies, the Lords Spiritual, will get "Big G" to have us fried or baked for Eternity.....
The introduction of religious education in schools could mellow be a positive move depending on what the definition of RE actually is. The concept that introducing RE based solely on orthodox teachings will reduce violence and make children more 'moral' is plainly rubbish. However a subject called RE that deals with the concepts behind the major religions and explorer their history and their various differing understandings of moral values and mans relationship to each other their spiritual comprehension of the world can only enhance a students understanding of why the world is the way it is. That would be education not indoctrination. Whoever was at the education ministry that said that RE could not be introduced because there were too many religions to deal with is cleary a moron. That's like saying we won't teach history because there is too much of it!