In the decisive runoff for Sofia's mayoral seat, the battle wasn't just between candidates Vasil Terziev and Vanya Grigorova; it extended to the method voters preferred – traditional ballots or electronic machines. A noteworthy 291,000 voters embraced the efficiency of technology, opting for machine voting, while 146,000 adhered to the familiarity of paper ballots. This dichotomy provides intriguing insights into the evolving landscape of voter preferences.

The Central Election Commission's data shed light on additional nuances within the ballots cast. Approximately 3,000 ballots were deemed invalid, and over 9,000 boldly bore the statement "I do not support anyone." These numbers add an interesting layer to the electoral landscape, reflecting a sentiment of dissatisfaction or protest among voters.

The breakdown of voting preferences revealed a pattern: Vasil Terziev garnered more support through machine voting, while Vanya Grigorova found stronger resonance among those opting for traditional paper ballots.

However, the aftermath of this electoral showdown takes an intriguing turn with Vanya Grigorova challenging the results. The Administrative Court's decision to open a case on Grigorova's appeal against the victory of Vasil Terziev introduces a legal dimension to the post-election narrative. Grigorova's request to delay Terziev taking office until the court reaches a verdict was, nonetheless, rejected.