From The Economist
Bulgaria's entry into the European Union was delayed by worries over corruption, organised crime and slow judicial reform. When it and Romania joined in 2007, the European Commission was given a "mechanism for co-operation and verification" that lets it monitor reforms and impose sanctions. It duly withheld EUR 220 M of EU money from Bulgaria in 2008. The Socialist-led government responded crossly, accusing the commission of double standards and of using its monitoring mechanism as a political tool.
In February advisers to the prime minister, Sergei Stanishev, hatched an extraordinary new plan. Under this the commission and other EU members would get more power to intervene where "weaknesses may be qualified as structural and persistent and...cannot be resolved by the Bulgarian government alone". The plan proposes that European officials and diplomats should be involved in monitoring implementation of laws, managing EU funds and supervising courts, prosecutors and investigators. They would follow cases of political corruption and organised crime that the judicial system has been slow to tackle. The suggestion is that such a "partnership" would be better than the commission's mechanism-although that may reflect the fact that it would be directed from Sofia, not Brussels.
Mr Stanishev presented this secret plan to the commission's president, José Manuel Barroso, in early March. The response was cool. A spokesman says that Mr Barroso rejects the notion of a parallel structure to the current mechanism. EU ambassadors to Sofia, who have just been told of the plan, are also sceptical. One senior diplomat says it would be wrong to wrest the carrot and stick away from the commission, which has both political independence and the trust of EU members-unlike the Bulgarian government. Indeed, some ambassadors detect a wheeze by Bulgaria's Socialists to tell voters that the EU has "newly regained trust" in the government before an election in June. Putting the commission and EU members in charge of reforms might also inhibit future criticism.
Despite this negative response, the government is pushing ahead with its idea. It has set the end of March as a target date. The foreign minister, Ivaylo Kalfin, has even suggested a similar scheme for all EU members.
вЂњNo, they should cut off one of their hands and let them live and everyone will know they have been stealing. That's more of a deterrent than death.вЂќ
No. That wonвЂ™t do. They will say that their hand got blown by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan while working for a UN sponsored relief organization and they would ask for compensation from the Americans. Nobody would be able to prove they didnвЂ™t work for etc, etc, and all will agree that it is the fault of the Americans. Just a clarification: it happened during the Bush administration; the present administration is saintly.
Better hang them. In Plovdiv. The scenery is so beautiful. That will teach them a lesson.
No, they should cut off one of their hands and let them live and everyone will know they have been stealing. That's more of a deterrent than death. Death is too easy for these scoundrels. I suppose they justify their actions by saying that they did it so their families and their loved ones can have a better life. They have no shame and no conscience.
Another "ingenous" idea of Bulgarian corrupt politicians. I have an alternative plan - anyone caught stealing from the people of Bulgaria should be shot and hung up from the lamp posts in the capital Sofia. Or any more deterring punishment to stop the cycle of corruption and rape of the land.
50% more Chinese Tourists in Bulgaria
Potentially Defective Aluminum was used by All Car Manufacturers in Japan