Watering down Bulgaria's bill for confiscation of illegally obtained assets may result in partial amnesty, Germany's ambassador in Sofia has warned.

"The new bill should not cover a too short timespan or exclude from the outset important areas. Otherwise it will only grant partial amnesty," Germany's Ambassador Matthias Hoepfner said in an interview for Capital daily.

The diplomat did not hide his disappointment that the draft law, initiated by Bulgaria's former Justice Minister and current Vice President Margarita Popova and widely touted by the ruling party as a powerful tool in crime and corruption combat, was not adopted in its first version.

The first draft of the bill envisaged that authorities will have the right to launch investigations into incomes and acquisitions for the last twenty-five years and seize assets without conviction. Now the timespan has been reduced to ten years and forfeiture is allowed only given that an indictment is already in place.

"It is a pity that last year's bill for the forfeiture of illegally acquired assets, drawn up by former Justice Minister Popova, failed to pass in parliament. This is a well established measure for curbing organized crime in many countries. Forfeiture is what criminals, especially in the field of economic crime, fear most."

"I hope the new bill will deal with this difficult issue with sufficient precision. When a clerk has a very big house and drives a luxury car despite his relatively low income, he should be obliged to explain how he managed to pile up his wealth," Ambassador Hoepfner said.

Amendments to the long-delayed bill authorizing widespread confiscation of illegally obtained assets are expected to be conclusively adopted by Bulgaria's parliament by the Easter holidays.

Bulgarian authorities are likely to have the right to launch probes and seize - following an indictment - unexplained wealth, worth more than BGN 250,000, which has been acquired over the last ten years, under the draft law.

It sets out a regime for non-conviction based asset forfeiture, but the procedure will be launched only if the person is indicted with terrorism, participation in an organized criminal group, kidnapping, enticement to prostitution, human trafficking, theft, robbery, embezzlement, unprofitable deal drugs and tax evasion.

The opposition has slammed the amendments, saying that it creates conditions for persecutions and repressions of political opponents, while making untouchable the white color criminals, who piled up their wealth through privatization deals and administrative crimes.

The majority in Bulgaria's parliament surprisingly failed to pass through the keenly expected bill in July last year, triggering fierce criticism in the EU and US, as well as suspicions of a set-up.

The draft law, initiated by Bulgaria's former Justice Minister and current Vice President Margarita Popova and widely touted by the ruling party as a powerful tool in crime and corruption combat, initially envisaged that the commission will have the right to launch investigations into incomes and acquisitions for the last twenty-five years and seize assets without conviction.

"The new version of the bill seeks to target not the ordinary citizens, but the members of organized crime groups," the recently appointed Justice Minister Diana Kovacheva justified the changes.

Analysts however have commented that the period of ten years and the condition for an indictment in place practically will make many people untouchable.

Bulgaria's law on asset forfeiture needs to be comprehensive, and backed up with strong institutions, if it is to be effective in dissuading organized crime and high-level corruption, the European Commission recommended in its interim report, issued earlier this year.

The interim report pointed out that while the European Commission recommended the inclusion of the power for the Commission for the Identification and Forfeiture of Criminal Assets (CEPACA) to undertake pro-active asset verification of senior officials and politicians, this aspect does not seem to be pursued.

Brussels stressed that the parliamentary discussions should be an opportunity to strengthen the draft to ensure an asset forfeiture regime which is comprehensive in scope, covers a sufficient timespan to be effective, and is backed up by strong institutions.

We need your support so Novinite.com can keep delivering news and information about Bulgaria! Thank you!