OLAF: Bulgaria's Agriculture Fund Ignored Blatant SAPARD Abuses
This becomes clear from a devastatingly critical OLAF letter sent to Bulgaria's Deputy Prime Minister, Meglena Plugchieva, the National Coordinator of the financial management of EU funds, Dimitar Ivanovski, the Agriculture Minister, Valeri Tzvetanov, and the Head of the State Agriculture Fund, Alizan Yahova.
The text of the letter has been revealed by the Sega Daily as cited by the BGNES news agency. The letter was sent after an OLAF mission to Bulgaria from January 26 until January 30, 2009.
The February letter is unlike the OLAF letter, which leaked to the Bulgarian press in July 2008, and claimed that influential forces in the Bulgarian government patronized firms committing SAPARD abuses, and named the so called "Nikolov-Stoykov group" as an example.
The February letter is more neutral in its tone but the OLAF Head, Franz-Hermann Bruener, is explaining to the Bulgarian civil servants what constituted a violation in the EU, and that Bulgaria is supposed to notify the European Commission about every discovered violation two months after the end of every quarter.
"Many of the violations uncovered in the last summer, at the end of January, 2009, have still not been reported to the Commission, or to the National Coordinator", Bruener writes.
During their January visit, OLAF experts have inspected the State Agriculture Fund's actions on 17 projects with gross violations. Four of these have been reported by the Fund itself, and the other 13 were reported as containing abuses by OLAF in 2008.
OLAF has found that the Fund had not demanded back the EU subsidies from nine of the firms, which were exposed as abusing the money by OLAF.
Penalty procedures against four other firms have started but are found to have failed. Four of the firms which were inspected in January 2009 are believed by OLAF to be related to the so called Nikolov-Stoykov group, and that each of them bought agricultural machines with at least one fake deal.
These firms are "ET Kartel - Valentin Yanev", "Solveks Mira Fruit Jsc", "Solaris AC", and "Riokom Single Member Ltd". The State Agriculture Fund, which is also Bulgaria's Executive Agency under the SAPARD program, has asked only the last firm to return its SAPARD subsidies but the firm has not done so.
The Fund also has not notified about the violations of Solaris and Kartel the Ministry of Finance, which is supposed to refer the matters to the European Commission. The Fund has told the Ministry about Solveks but has inexplicably failed to demand back the SAPARD money from it.
The four firms in questions received a total of BGN 3,3 M in SAPARD program subsidies.
OLAF has also inspected five other firms unrelated to the Nikolov-Stoykov group which were said to have bought food processing equipment with at least one fake deal according to OLAF's own report from 2008.
These include "Mekom-Silistra", KFM, Helikom Ltd, Tinned Food Factory YUPER, and Top Konserv Jsc. The Fund has demanded back the SAPARD funds only from YUPER, KFM, and Top Koserv, who have failed to return any money.
- » The IMF Supports Bulgaria's Efforts to Enter the Eurozone Waiting Room
- » Prime Minister Borisov will Participate in the Regular European Council Meeting
- » Bulgaria has One of the Strongest Employment Growth Rates in the EU for the Quarter
- » Bulgaria is Among the EU Countries with the Highest Number of Old Aircraft
- » Kristalina Georgieva: I Expect Bulgaria to Enter the Eurozone Waiting Room Next Year
- » Bulgarian PM: EU integration of the Western Balkans Would be Among the Priorities of the Bulgarian Presidency of the EU
"You benefited from other peoples knowledge but you did not gain their knowledge,"
Do you think perhaps I didn't ask them to explain what they were doing? I learned quite a bit from what they told me about it all.
Now you're making an unfair generalization.
"annoying habit of yours to use such second hand wisdom to discredit a first hand gained one. вЂњ
Sorry if I misquoted you. I'm not going to quibble about the difference between konwledge and wisdom. You're right about that.
But since people are of different natures, and often bring the same problem with a different angle to it, one can gain experience "second hand" that someone else would call an untruth because of his or her first-hand experience, which was also as different as the people involved.
And you seem to annoy quite easily.
вЂњAs for "second-hand information", as you called it, that's what you get from your ancestors, from any library, or by surfing the internet, so don't knock it. It can be valuable, even save your life.вЂќ
Are you being untruthful on purpose or you donвЂ™t know the difference between information and wisdom?
Where did I speak of вЂњsecond-hand informationвЂќ in my posts regarding the topic at hand? This is what I said:
вЂњ... it is not my concern about your life that prompted my remark but the annoying habit of yours to use such second hand wisdom to discredit a first hand gained one. вЂњ
The expression I used was вЂњsecond hand wisdomвЂќ, not second hand information as you claimed.
And all that lecturing about the virtue of the second-hand information, вЂњwhat you get from your blah, blah, blah...so don't knock it.вЂќ
After telling you about my background, my education and considering your often professed disregard for the googling вЂњmodsвЂќ the punch line вЂњso donвЂ™t knock itвЂќ sounds totally twisted. Irrational?
вЂњI can't say how close to death you've ever been, but I have been twice now, and both times I was saved by other people's knowledge. Why else do you go to a doctor?вЂќ
What does that prove? You benefited from other peoples knowledge but you did not gain their knowledge, except of course if you have become a doctor yourself. lol
BTW, was that second-hand information that you gain from your ancestors, from the library, from surfing the internet or the doctors that saved your life?
Your obtrusive desire to win on any cost is truly mind boggling.
As I've stated before in other arguments, personal experience isn't the only way to learn.
As for "second-hand information", as you called it, that's what you get from your ancestors, from any library, or by surfing the internet, so don't knock it. It can be valuable, even save your life.
I can't say how close to death you've ever been, but I have been twice now, and both times I was saved by other people's knowledge. Why else do you go to a doctor?
Chushki: you are a very amusing person, can you please spell out more of your insights into BG culture and problems with society? I couldn't stop laughing when I read your words, incredibly amusing for their grandiose stupidity and then the back and forth 12year old insults with the judge were even more amusing. Please keep it up, laughter is much needed in this time of crises.
"You just go work a legal assistance office for a couple of years, and then come back and tell me what you've learned."
Would it suffice if I tell you that my grandfather, my father, my father's brother, my mother's brother, all were in the legal profession: Lawyers and judges devoted to their vocation?
I am sure that working in a legal assistance office for a couple of years wouldn't have made me smarter or wiser about the topic at hand one bit more than I am now.
And may I suggest that you get married or just share your life with a woman, raise a child or two, and than come back and tell me what you've learned.
You just go work a legal assistance office for a couple of years, and then come back and tell me what you've learned.
All you've said is that women cry on each others' shoulders, too, which, as I read it, means that they don't understand men any better than we do women.
Men and women think in different languages, and much gets lost in translation.
Even the husbands I know who are happily married tell me they don't understand their wives. Fortunately love bridges this gap to a certain extent, but not completely.
"What makes you think it's nonsense? You're a woman. You understand women. Men don't. I've had enough unhappy husbands and boyfriends cry on my shoulder to have some experience in this area."
Because, Bill, this is the most disgusting stereotyping you choose to believe in. I do not understand all women and I am not like all women. There are enough unhappy women and girlfriends that cry on any shoulder they can find available to accommodate their need for crying. And according to your logic I should come to the same conclusion about man as you do about women. It would be an embarrassing generalization.
It seems you look for wisdom in the life of every available whiner you've encountered in your life and maybe this is why you missed on many things. However, it is not my concern about your life that prompted my remark but the annoying habit of yours to use such second hand wisdom to discredit a first hand gained one.
"It's a well-known fact that NO man understands women. The best we can do is try to compensate."
"There's an old saying: Ahow me a man who says he understands women and I'll show you a liar."
This is the kind of nonsense that makes me throw up...Get out of my way. lol