the comments about the bulgarian justice system being in place longer then the brithish one ,idiot grow up ,that as nothing to do with corruption that has nothing to do with the arrest and beating up of an innocent 18yr old man that as nothing to do with police taking bribes to release the real thug that as nothing to do with a corrupt judicail system in varna closing ranks to hide the corruption ,the lenght of time a judicial system as been in place does not mean it is without corruption ,if there was this type of corruption against a british innocent youngman how much corruption is there against ordenary bulgarian people who have not got the power or means to fight agains injustices,why do you think we are atill fighting for justice for michael he is free with a pardon ,but we feel we owe it to michael and the desent people of bulgariia to fight to clear his name in doing so we believe we will make bulgaria a better place to live and a better place to visit also we will remove a violant thug of the streets of liverpool if the real culprit
My dearest IAN KNUX,
there is NO evidence,that SANKEY commited actus reus?
DO YOU KNOW THE RULES OF EVIDENCE?
If Joe Andeson is talking to a newspaper,that SANKEY confesed to whomever and ome days later withdreww his statement...
SORRY,this is ONLY a HEARSAY!
It is not admissible in the courts of law!
And EVEN if Shield was sentenced wrongfully,the Bulgarian Government have to reimburse him for time spent in Bulgarian detention center ONLY if there are SUCH
laws in Bulgarian,which give compensation to detainees,injustifiably convicted.
So...JOE ANDERSON ingnores ALL RULES OF EVIDENCE and proclaims 1) as
JUSTICE HIS OWN FEELINGS AND ITUTITION?!
WHO IS JOE ANDERSON? A poltician,who is CHASING the votes of the electorate in
And SOON,very SOON there are elections in his constituancy.,which consists 90% of Labor followers.
WHY POLITICISING THE CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ,Mr.Joe Anderson?
He is talking RUBBISH! ID EVIDENCE is not admissible in UK Criminal Courts...that is what he says.
Firstly it is NOT named ID evidence but TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE...evidence elicited from a witness.
Such a type of evidence is admissible in ALL Western jurisdictions.
2)" The Bulgarian system(he probably means judicial system) is barbaric."
HOW DOES HE KNOW? DID HE STUDY LAW IN BULGARIA? DID HE WORK AS AN
ATTORNEY OR AS A JUDGE OR PROCURATOR IN BULGARIA?
If Michael Shilds felt innocent,WHY HE DID NOT REQUIST THROUGH HIS DEFENCE
Of course the BG system allows NEW evidence but ac.to the Criminal Ptrocedure it can be produced ONLY in a trial...
NOT in the office of the Leader of UK Labor Party!!!!
After a sentence was issued,a NEW trial in Criminal law could be initiated by Shild's attorney.
The BG Attorney General is obliged acc. to Criminal Procedure to re-open a trial ONLY if he is presented with new facts,which must give grounds for starting a NEW TRIAL.
A person,named SPANKEY,wrote a statement(confesion) at the Police but later withdrew this so called confesion.
And this happens in UK,NOT in Bulgaria.
If the UK Police charged SPANKEY with some kind of criminal activity,BG could require EXTRADITION...but how in the world could te BG Procurator DEMAND,that UK Government delivers Spankey to Sofia?
HE HAS NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANYTHING!
3)If Shild thinks he is innocent,WHY HE DOES NOT ASK BG TO REOPEN THE TRIAL?
Again the English show their prejudice,that Bulgaria as a small country(and somewhere there on the wartorn BALKANS) could NOT possibly have
a PROPER JUDICIAL SYSTEM!
HOW DO THEY DARE!
Bulgaria existed as a STATEHOOD looooooooooooooooooong before the word ENGLISH existed!
When the English were still wearing lathr skins and hunting wild animals!
THE ROMANS WERE WHO tought them CIVILISATION AND ESTABLISHED THEIR JUDICIAL SYSTEM on this foggy island!
Even up til today,their LAWS are ROMAN laws...I just had a case in UK Conveyancing law.
Many times I have also divorce cases...UK citisens,living in Germany,who are divorcing here.
The German Family Law allowes couples to use their NATIVE divorce law,EVEN if they use a German court.
Okay, so all the "proof" that Shields is innocent (and all your pontifications thereof) hinges so heavily on the fact that some Liverpudlian has a gut feeling (so very GW Bush of him) that Shields is such a nice boy and that Sankey gave a confession but NOT really, really a confession that counts for anything under law because that wouldn't be as convenient, would it?
In that case, let then extradite Tweedledum to be convicted and clear Tweedledee.
Again, that wouldn't be as convenient, would it?
Yeah - and if they did wrongly incarcerate Shields - and did ignore evidence that Sankey was the guilty party, then Bulgaria should step up to the plate- re-examine the case and if wrong, admit their own guilt and pay the young man for taking 4 years of his life. Then they should set about extraditing Sankey.
Joe Anderson, Liverpool Labour Party leader looks like a Russian gangster. lol
Clearly he is setting up to sue Bulgaria for false incarceration of Shields and Bulgaria will have hell to pay for keeping an innocent man in prison for 4 years!
50% more Chinese Tourists in Bulgaria
Potentially Defective Aluminum was used by All Car Manufacturers in Japan