I had to laugh myself to death about your proposal to Percy to live under a mosquito net.
When I was a child ,my grandfather had also plenty of bee-hives...
we eat ONLY honey,my honey...NEVER SUGAR!
I was tought to be relaxed,when a bee approaches me and not to wave my hands...
this is the mistake,which many people here,in Grunewald,BERLIN do as here are may be
NOT civilized bees but wasps from the forest.
if you really live in LA,you could buy Criminal Law on the ALPTMAN PLAZA in the USED books
store,on the UCLA campus.
Did you read Michael Schields(such a stupid name! In German language it means "sign")
As I read in SOFOA ECHO some years ago, the WITNESSES were NOT as YOU say
DOORMEN but there were many guests and bypassers,who witnessed the fight among
the LIVERPOOL hooligans.
AND WHAT IS THIS ALLEGATION THAT A BULGARIAN POLICE OGFFICER WENT ON
HOLIDAYS TO Turkey?
And he was boasting to YOU,DEAR FRIENDS OF LIVERPOOL, that he was bribed?!
YOU OUGHT TO HAVE A BLOOSSOMING FANTASY!
Everything you say is ONLY a HEARSAY and JUST GOSSIP!
Hello Percy,HOW do you want to prevent the expansion of his business?
WHY 20 bee-hives did not disturb you but 30 or 40 shall disturb you?
In order to get an injunctive relief,you ought to convince the judge,that
YOUR RIGHTS OF QUIT ENJOYMENT OF YOUR PROPERTY WERE TANGATED,VIOLATED?
You mist plead,that the increased number of bee-hives is disturbing the peaceful
use of your house.
The same requirements apply for the crap yard owner in case you want to open a
garage in your back yard and take business from him.
YOU ARE SAYING THIS?
Do you know how many people in California prisons were detained JUST because they
did NOT get a California driver's license after driving in the State for three months?
hELLO Brit in BG,
you are right about saying,that the VENUE of the crime determines usually the JURISDICTION OF A COURT.
Neverthelesthe Rules of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE allow the transfer of jurisdiction to
another court,mostly the residence of the suspect.
This is done ALL THE TIME IN USA...to save judicial costs.
A Court in Bahamas,e.g. could have a jurisdiction over an actus reus,commited by
a foreign citizen,despite the fact that the crime was commited on the soil of Canada,e.g.
As for Sankey,the UK General attorney could initiate investigations,if he had had sufficient forensic evidence.
As the BG Police did not arrest Sankey,there is no a docie(file)on him.
Scotland yard was NOT in this time on the cime scene ...how could they start a trial against Sankey?
Nellie of AMERICA,
you ought to get the book "CRIMINAL LAW...American legal case studies) by WEST Publishing Corporation and study the Chapter about
EXUSES IN CRIMINAL LAW.
In NO ONE jurisdiction...either Anglo-Saxon or GERMAN or BULGARIAN or UK or CYPRIOT
DRUNKENES IS EXUSE FOR COMMITING A CRIME!
If someone throws a stone on the head of helpless human-being...it is NOT accident...
IT IS A CRIMINAL ACT!
As the perpetrator is an adult,the only exuse would be if he was MENTALLY INCAPABLE.
My dearest IAN KNUX,
there is NO evidence,that SANKEY commited actus reus?
DO YOU KNOW THE RULES OF EVIDENCE?
If Joe Andeson is talking to a newspaper,that SANKEY confesed to whomever and ome days later withdreww his statement...
SORRY,this is ONLY a HEARSAY!
It is not admissible in the courts of law!
And EVEN if Shield was sentenced wrongfully,the Bulgarian Government have to reimburse him for time spent in Bulgarian detention center ONLY if there are SUCH
laws in Bulgarian,which give compensation to detainees,injustifiably convicted.
you are a typical ENGLISH! You know EVERYTHING...even the laws of Bulgaria!
Such a SUPERIORITY IS ONLY TYPICAL FOR THE ENGLISH!
50% more Chinese Tourists in Bulgaria
Potentially Defective Aluminum was used by All Car Manufacturers in Japan