Search Forum

RSS Forum rules

138567 opinions matching your query "-"



#1
Warfou - 30 Aug 2015 // 00:37:40

The MiGs 29 are no scrap. Their maneuverability is impressive. After being equipped with modern western avionics and NATO compatible weapons they can serve for another 10 years or so. The new western planes are expensive and those which can be bought on second hand (the older F-16 A/B) are not better than modernised MiGs. Poland uses 32 modernised MIGs 29 along with 48 newly built US F-16 C/D Block 52.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrHlJmJibOs
http://polska-zbrojna.pl/home/articleshow/6194?t=MiG-i-po-liftingu-nowoczesne-jak-F-16

#2
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:21:49

Newly-released video alleges Turkey is sending weapons to Syria

www(dot)liveleak(dot)com/view?i=b47_1432935908

#3
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:21:29

Newly-released video alleges Turkey is sending weapons to Syria

www(dot)liveleak(dot)com/view?i=b47_1432935908

#4
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:20:45

Newly-released video alleges Turkey is sending weapons to Syria

www(dot)liveleak(dot)com/view?i=b47_1432935908

#5
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:19:51

Newly-released video alleges Turkey is sending weapons to Syria

www(dot)liveleak(dot)com/view?i=b47_1432935908

#6
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:17:16

Do you mean the 3 "Bulgarians", actually Arabs with Bulgarian citizenship, Bg nationals of Arab ethnic origin?

#7
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:14:03

Thracian language has vanished (unless Albanian is THE Neo-Thracian language) and Thracian genes are to be found in Greeks too (and in other ethnicities like Bulgarians), not only in Romanians. Greeks are actually the chronologically first (=the earliest) ethnicity that has ever mixed with the Thracian one, thereby partly assimilating the latter. Romanians have no monopoly on Thracians' genes since they are predominantly Slavic (according to serious genetic studies), they speak not a word of Thracian (the extremely few pre-Roman words in Romanian have Albanian counterparts/homologues and are in fact Albanian and, since Romanian "historians" and "linguists" claim Albanians are Illyrian and not Thracian, those words are probably Illyrian). Romanian claims to exclusivity on Thracian heritage (including/primarily their territories) is therefore unfounded. If however accepted (by using the "reductio ad absurdum" argument) that would mean the entire Thracian territory or, perhaps, "only" the entire Thracian territory located north of Jirecek's (or similar) line(s) should belong to Romania (that is nearly all of Bulgarian territory located north of the Balkan range).
Also through repeated mixed ethnic (inter)breeding with people from the Balkans there probably are Irish/Swedish/Danish/Georgian/Armenian/Thai/Cambodian people (albeit very few) with Thracian genes. What now? South Dobruja is an Irish/Swedish/.... territory?

#8
GrueFski - 29 Aug 2015 // 23:08:25

Moesia is both a historical and also a geographical region. Scythia Minor, the real/initial/genuine/original Dobruja, is only a historical region, having no natural borders to separate it from the rest of Moesia (Inferior) in the southwest, the border between Moesia proper and Scythia Minor being a conventional line running from Rasova on the Danube to Kranevo/Albena.
Greeks became indigenous in the entire Moesia once the last Thracian had been either Romanized or Hellenized. Greeks had been the 2nd most ancient ethnicity in Moesia (Scythia Minor obviously included), only 2nd to Thracians but some (a few) of the Thracians there had been assimilated by the Greeks, the bulk by the Romans. So that, when Romans/Greeks assimilated the last Thracian, Greeks became the most ancient ethnicity in Moesia, they became indigenous. The fact that the Greeks in Moesia only lived in a limited number of localities, most of them confined to the coastline area of Black Sea in Moesia, unlike the Romans, has no relevance whatsoever since Ro "historians" only operate with entire historical regions (such is Moesia). After all, no historical region in this world has its entire territory populated with humans, the vast majority of the territory of (almost?) any historical region on this planet has never been inhabited by people (meaning there has never been a human locality on top of that vast majority of territory: hamlet, village, town, city), has never been overbuilt, overlayed by any type of localities.
Greeks in Moesia have only been (nearly) totally assimilated only in the 10th century AD, once the "urban facies (=face)" of the Dridu archeological culture/civilization can be observed there (at least according to Ro "historians" and "archeologists")
Actually indigenousness has no relevance, no significance, no importance. What really matters is what ethnicity is/was the most ancient, the earliest in a certain, disputed historical region (among the ethnicities still existing today). Thus, there actually is no need for the Greeks to be indigenous in Dobruja at present, to have lived continously there ever since the Thracians of Dobruja were completely assimilated. There is not even the need for any non-indigenous Greek to be living nowadays in Dobruja, there might be no (indigenous or non-indigenous) Greeks living in Dobruja at present, they still are the most ancient ethnicity whose members have ever lived in Dobruja (they settled there in the 7th century BC) since Thracians no longer exist.

#9
Fr Jack Hackett - 29 Aug 2015 // 19:55:37

It seems that people who have been granted asylum in the EU are doing everything they can to destroy the people who gave freedom to them and their families

#10
Seedy - 29 Aug 2015 // 19:21:34

How about strong sanctions against EU politicians who support human trafficking through their dogged refusal to take the proper steps to secure our borders against invaders?