I'm all for labelling terrorists, people who don't mind murdering a few thousand innocents to achieve their political ends. But the problem is how to do it without also labelling the CIA, MI5, KGB, MOSSAD etc. the same.
Nearly every country in the world has a history of killing people for some perceived political gain. Where exactly do you draw the distinction, without being prejudicial?
Any government that funds or condones the action of its own particular 'Civil/Military Intelligence organisation' is just as guilty as the rest and should not be calling for the inclusion of it's own 'enemies' on a terrorist blacklist. A perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black.
People are rescued by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) from the floods as heavy seas and high tides sweep across Wales, 05 December 2013...
"To shout: "You did not join our economic structure, so we support peaceful protests against your decision!" is, quite amazing, to say the least. This situation is related to the hysteria started up by some Europeans in connection with the ... read
A husband comes home late in the night. His wife starts yelling at him:
“Where the heck have you been?”