Dear writers of novitiate.com
You should know better that between allegations made by a trash site/newspaper like bivol.bg and the actual proven facts there is a HUUUGE difference. Once you disrespect said difference and approve it with a headline of an article you are spreading false informations, which makes you as yellow press as the shittiest yellow newspapers, but on top of this your acts can be considered a crime and a fraud and are punished very severely in many countries. There is NO sentence of a judge confirming that BB has had any ties with the mafia and that he has perpetrated a crime of a kind. Until that becomes a fact you are blindly lying and trashing the name and honor of a person and as said such statements ARE punishable by law.

Svetlo, you have a strong point there. Very often journalists excagerate with their titles.

However, as a foreigner, I cannot understand this BG document.

Could you translate it?

thx

Maybe I am utterly confused. Can someone explain this to me?

Why would Boyko want to deny that he was an informant in the anti-mafia police? Isn't it a good thing if Boyko was? He would have been helping to stop the corruption and make Bulgaria more transparent. Why is this a bad thing?