Mehmet ?mer: Turkey's Political Islam Brings Harm to Pious People
Political Islam in Turkey has brought heavy harm on devout religious people in Turkey, Mehmet ?mer, Editor-in-Chief of Zaman Bulgaria, has said in an opinion piece for BGNES wire service.
Citing concepts developed by prominent scholars, he has also opined that the last few governments of Turkey have been applying in politics a mixture of Kemalism and Islam.
"Kemalism" is the name given to the ideology of Mustafa Kemal Atat?rk, the founder of the Republic of Turkey in 1923 out of the ashes of the Ottoman Empire. While he has been much praised for creating a "secular" state, critics have accused him and his supporters of authoritarianism (and also suppression of minority and religious rights) that fuelled political turmoil in the decades following his death in 1938.
?mer has commented on the developments in neighboring Turkey days after the government appointed a trustee at Zaman Media group, in compliance with an earlier court order, sparking protests in front of Zaman's offices and an outcry from human rights and press freedom organizations.
Zaman was closely linked to the Hizmet movement of US-based cleric Fethullah G?len, whom President Erdogan has repeatedly accused of orchestrating a plot to topple him and the government.
After Beng?t?rk and IMC TV stopped their satellite broadcast, "the most influential media, with the highest circulation, such as Zaman newspaper" followed suit.
"The specialized court in Istanbul appointed an illegal trustee at Zaman's office on purely political grounds. All of this happened in breach of the Turkish constitution's Article 30, which prohibits the confiscation of media and their assets," ?mer wrote.
(Note. Article 30, in the section of "Protection of printing facilities", reads: "A printing house and its annexes, duly established as a press enterprise under law, and press equipment shall not be seized, confiscated, or barred from operation on the grounds of having been used in a crime.")
"Turkey, where rules of democracy and laws are systematically violated, once more witnessed one of the darkest days in its history. With the silencing of opposition media, the opposition in Turkey is being eliminated step by step."
"What is a paradox in this case is that the main ruling Party of Justice and Development [AKP] made its first steps in politics, protection of free speech has a vast presence in it program."
"Historically, the most tragic days for Turkish journalism is the period between 1957 and 1960, during the last years of governance of the Democratic party. Journalists were sent to prison there as well, access to paper for opposition newspapers was significantly cut as it was under state monopoly. Interference [of the state in media affairs] even reached a point where newspaper columns that had gone through censorship were sometimes published blank. Compared to present days, however, no confiscation of assets and property of media was in place, nor were media outlets closed down. There were no journalists dismissed upon an order by authorities either."
That President Erdogan is seeking to concentrate all the power in his hands, alongside "the fact he does not trust Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu whom he brought to this office himself", is "crystal clear", and he will do everything to fulfill his goal, ?mer notes.
"The situation in Turkey nowadays reminds of the early Republican period of one-party rule, the role of an authoritarian leader dominates. And there are attempts at institutionalizing this democracy in the form of a "Turkish-type" presidential republic".
?mer quotes political scientist Ihsan Yilmaz as calling AKP a "Kemalo-Islamist" party aimed at raising "a new (religious) generation" through social engineering and the opportunities presented by state power, "as the Kemalists [did]."
AKP does not feel satisfied with just "marking the other ones", but also designates them as enemies or demonizes them," in the observations of Yilmaz.
?mer points to the December 17, 2013 corruption scandal as the starting point of accusations hurled by the AKP at is opponents of being part of a "parallel state" and of purges at the state administration.
An economics professor, Mehmed Altan, is for his part quoted as saying that the present authorities "are maybe the last 'religious Kemalist' governance of the chaotically regime established after September 12, 1980", but with the aim of transforming the "Kemalist" into "religious" youth, and "rakia into ayran".
- » The Economist: The Difficulties of Exchanging Territory in the Balkans
- » Tomislav Donchev: In the Istanbul Convention, Society Saw a Great Deal of its Fears
- » For How Long will Housing Prices in Bulgaria Continue to Increase?
- » The West and Russia Stabbed the Kurdish People in the Back
- » Deutsche Welle: Why the EU does not Want to Hurry with Bulgaria's Entry into Schengen
- » Ski Resort Construction Causing Irreversible Damage to Pirin
And this is the country which Merkel wants as a full EU member. If this plan succeeds, we can say goodbye to the civilization of Europe which has been built up by our ancestors over thousands of years. Tt was built on the backs of their hard work, dedication, inventiveness as well as their blood, yet millions of people are being welcomed here who have made it plain that they only wish to live off what our ancestors built and what we are working for until it (and we) have been totally destroyed
Islam as a religious ideology is totalitarian and with the way Erdogan is muscling in his government here in the west we see this the smart thing Bulgaria did was join NATO but I fear that Turkey will get into the EU ..that is a disastrous Idea about as disastrous as Merkel opening the floodgates to unvetted refugees
Sultan Erdogan is pure evil and a corrupt dictator. Simple as that. Look at the way he shuts down anyone or anything that goes against his ideals; and he has no problem with violently attacking his own people and shutting down their voice. Not to mention the Kurd situation. Turkey should never be allowed to join the EU. That anyone should even entertain that idea is just preposterous. If the Turkish people as a nation had any balls, they would incite a civil war against him, his government and his misguided approach of being a \"democratic\" leader of their nation. Their rights are being eroded little by little and they allow him to do that.