Bulgaria, The Next 20 Years?
Steve Hanke is Professor of Applied Economics at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA and a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C., USA. The article originally appeared in the latest issue of Capital newspaper as it marked its 20th anniversary.
First things first. My congratulations to Capital for producing a high-quality weekly for twenty years. That is a real accomplishment, and one that I hope Capital repeats during the next twenty years.
With those good wishes, I move on to address my subject: Bulgaria, the next twenty years? But, to do that, we must take an all-important brief flash-back to roughly the time when Capital was born, twenty years ago. Communism had just collapsed. But, thanks to decades of communism, Bulgaria’s institutions were in ruins – in a state of dysfunction, or worse.
The resulting distorted space that was left provided a perfect spawning ground for a pan-Balkan mafia of power, reach, creativity and venality. The civil war in Yugoslavia, which began in the summer of 1990, added high-octane fuel to the mafia’s activities. As it turns out, Bulgaria was in the mafia’s vortex. In consequence, corruption and criminality became Bulgaria’s hallmark – damaging its reputation, among other things.
That was then. Where is Bulgaria now, and where is it going? Two articles in major international magazines last month answer that equation. The first appeared in London’s Economist magazine on the 21st of September and covered the Delyan Peevski affair. The Economist concluded that Mr. Peevski “had become the symbol of everything that is wrong with Bulgarian politics.” Need I say more?
Only four days later, the French review L’Express published a scathing expos? of the Ivan Danov affair, including copies of relevant official documents. It is alleged that Mr. Danov used his creative genius to defraud the French government. Yes, according to L’Express, Mr. Danov, who is currently Bulgaria’s Minster of Investment Planning, has happily collected French welfare benefits for being unemployed in France, while employed in Bulgaria.
Should criminality and the lack of the rule of law continue to lift Bulgaria towards the top of the corruption world ratings, the next twenty years would look rather gloomy. Indeed, corruption is the main cause of Bulgaria’s hope deficit.
But, there is a brighter aspect to Bulgaria’s picture. Shortly before Capital published its first issue, Bulgaria’s monetary and fiscal institutions were badly malfunctioning. By early 1991, hyperinflation had reared its ugly head, with the monthly inflation rate peaking at 123% in February.
During a 1991 trip to Sofia, and in a monograph I co-authored with Dr. Kurt Schuler in 1991, Teeth for the Bulgarian Lev: A Currency Board Solution, I laid out a detailed plan to stop the hyperinflation with a currency board. Although the currency board was not adopted during Bulgaria’s 1991 episode of hyperinflation, there would soon be another opportunity.
Bulgaria witnessed a second bout of hyperinflation in February of 1997, with the peak monthly inflation rate reaching 242%. During that episode, the authorities were more anxious to solve Bulgaria’s monetary problems. While operating as President Stoyanov’s advisor, I was gratified to finally witness the installation, in July 1997, of Bulgaria’s currency board. Even more gratifying was the currency board’s performance: it killed the inflation overnight.
Bulgaria’s currency board is a shining example of how strong institutions can create stability in the face of political and economic turmoil. Since its introduction, the currency board has been refined, and the money and banking systems have been skillfully managed by the Bulgarian National Bank. The currency board institution is strong, automatic, provides discipline and allows Bulgaria to retain its monetary sovereignty. The system is one of the few solid institutions in Bulgaria. And, more importantly, it is supported by the public. In twenty years, the currency board system should still be a cornerstone for prosperity, and should still be providing Bulgaria with a positive unique selling proposition.
The Currency Board works, so don’t try to fix it, as the saying goes.
So, there we have the main bad and good elements inherited from Bulgaria’s recent past. Looking to the future, what are the good elements that lead to prosperity? Well, the story is always the same: if you increase economic freedom and the rule of law, and prosperity will follow. This is the model that has been successfully applied in countries like Singapore. Indeed, by embracing these principles, Singapore has gone from abject poverty, at its founding in 1965, to become one of the richest in the world.
And, how can this model be applied in practice, in a small developing country like Bulgaria?
Well, the following four principles summarize how Singapore, circa 1965, did it:
Embrace stable money. While stability might not be everything, everything is nothing without stability. (Fortunately, Bulgaria has already achieved this via the Currency Board).
Reject foreign aid, bail-outs, and subsidies. These handouts only lead to more corruption.
Increase economic freedom and competition via light taxation and regulation, with completely open and free trade.
Emphasize on personal security, protection of private property and public order: without the rule of law, the three principles listed above are impossible to achieve.
Some skeptics might argue that because Bulgaria is a small and poor country, it is doomed to poverty and corruption. Nonsense. Singapore is even smaller, and was even poorer in 1965, than Bulgaria is. Singapore applied these principles and transformed itself. If Bulgaria applies these principles, too, in twenty years time, it could be well on its way to such a turnaround. The choice is for Bulgarians to make, or not make.
The key for Bulgaria is to look inward, not to the EU or Russia or any other outside power for help. Build strong, Bulgarian institutions – like the currency board – that promote economic freedom under the rule of law. Such strong institutions are more powerful than self-serving bureaucrats, more powerful than corrupt politicians, and, yes, more powerful than the mafia. Here’s to twenty years of economic freedom and the rule of law for all Bulgarians.
- » DPS Scandal 'Will Create Islamist Party in Bulgaria,' Historian Warns
- » Bulgaria C-Bank Should Improve Transparency, Prof Hanke Says
- » Greece's Exceptional Access to IMF Funding
- » Internet Trolls Not Credible, PR Expert Maxim Behar Says
- » Terror Attack 'Unlikely' in Prague-Varna Bus Incident
- » Steve Hanke: Another Greek Debt Default Is Imminent
Why should it be more difficult? Modern technology provides incredible resources and avenues for innovation and creation. The bigger issue, and the one that will determine whether or not any country raises itself up, is the character of the country's people - and what behavior they are willing to accept from themselves, their government and their fellow countrymen.
This is interesting article for which it would be interesting to compare the difference in year 1965 and 2013 (today) where we have higher energy price, freedom of social environments (internet, TV, mobiles, etc) and various thing which raise question on amount of challenge to achieve turnaround compare to 1965 where Singapore was in right time for evolution. I believe 2013 is much harder for change than in 1965.